About a week ago, my colleagues and I received the peer-review comments for an article we submitted to a journal. At first, they were overwhelming. There was a long email with each reviewer summarizing their thoughts and recommendations. Attached was a track changes edition of the article. At first glance, it was daunting. We were happy the reviewers recommended publication, but it looked like we had a lot of revisions to complete. On second review, after I reminded myself that we did not have to take all the suggestions, things didn't look too shabby. We sat down, made a list of revisions, and got to work. My main job was taking the track changes document and completing a line edit. I like doing line edits, so this wasn't too bad. To show my work, I left comments for my colleagues when I opted NOT to accept a revision. Let's just say one reviewer was nit-picky. Their revisions were mainly stylistic and not substantive. As I line edited, my comments became more and more sarcastic. It's a good thing only we will see these notes. They say you never want to see how laws and sausage are made. I would add peer-reviewed scholarship to that list. What part of your job is messy?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |